Skip to main content
CContributors
Project overviewInitiate projectOpen discussionOpen audit roomPeopleTrust & Legal
Contact
Project overview
Beta community case

FloraScout

FloraScout is functional but not publicly launched yet: it needs beta users, ASO review, pricing signals, and community build-up.

AcceptedASO audit neededCharter: Concierge pilot · draftConsumer appOpen for beta contributors
FloraScout Plant-Dex app screen

Product screenshots

Store screenshot ready

FloraScout Plant-Dex with progress and houseplant cards
Plant-Dex with progress, first discoveries, and owned species.
FloraScout My Plants list with care notes
Owned plants with photo, botanical name, and a short care hint.
FloraScout home-zones view with plants grouped by room
Home logic: plants grouped by kitchen, living room, and kids room.
FloraScout detail view with properties and risk notes
Plant details with benefits, risk notes, and cautious wording.
FloraScout health check with score and evidence
Health check with score, observations, and explained sub-ratings.
FloraScout gardener chat with care recommendation
My Gardener: chat flow from plant photo to care task.
FloraScout shop with credits and monthly subscriptions
Credit shop with subscription tiers and transparent usage model.
FloraScout leaderboard with discovery points
Leaderboard as a light community loop for discoveries.
FloraScout care tasks and appointments screen
Tasks and appointments for watering, health checks, and recurring care.

Vision

Beta community / launch preparation

Identify plants, take care seriously.

FloraScout is product-ready enough for real beta signals, while pricing, launch messaging, and store positioning are still being validated.

The needed contributions are beta users, feedback, ASO review, pricing discovery, and community work before the public market launch.

Why now

As a consumer project, FloraScout can create real attention faster than the closed operating modules and explain Contributors by example.

Public audit summary

Short public framing. Internal notes and reviewer comments stay in the audit case.

Audit status
A - Publishable
Contribution readiness
ASO specialist and 6 secondary ask contexts are structured for curated contribution review.
Last reviewed
2026-05-15T12:00:00.000Z
Human gate
FloraScout was human-reviewed as a static beta read-model baseline; AI scorecards remain non-binding.
Verified artifacts
  • docs/showcase/florascout.md
  • README.md
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
  • VISION.md
Open risks
  • Complete ASO and beta-feedback loop before broad market push.

Structured ask list

Lead ask first, followed by secondary missions with capability, status, evidence, and value.

Lead ask01
aso-specialistLead askGrowth / communityOpen

ASO specialist

ASO specialist for v1.4.2 listing audit: keywords, screenshots, title, subtitle, conversion hypotheses, and review plan.

Why now
FloraScout can only work as a public proof point if search intent, screenshots, and beta feedback line up.
Format
Listing audit with priorities, keyword set, and screenshot story for App Store and Play Store.
Not meant as
No growth hacks, no paid UA campaign, no promise of medical or botanical certainty.
Owner
Nina Berger
Participation
Future recognition / CP contribution record, no automatic payment
Legal status
Platform review cleared for pilot framing
Apply to missionCP explained Open discussion
Secondary missions02
native-speaker-reviewContent / editorialDraft

Native store copy review

Reviews German/English store, onboarding, and plant-care wording.

Evidence
Annotated copy with more natural variants.
Mission value
100 CP
Owner
Nina Berger
Participation
Future recognition / CP contribution record, no automatic payment
Legal status
Not legally reviewed yet; not open for applications
Not open yetCP explained Open discussion
Secondary missions03
designer-layoutProduct discoveryDraft

Screenshot story layout

Orders screenshots so value, plant dex, and care tasks are immediately clear.

Evidence
Screenshot storyboard with text lengths.
Mission value
130 CP
Owner
Nina Berger
Participation
Future recognition / CP contribution record, no automatic payment
Legal status
Not legally reviewed yet; not open for applications
Not open yetCP explained Open discussion
Secondary missions04
reviewer-poolExpert reviewOpen

Beta feedback reviewer

Sorts beta feedback by bug, UX, plant knowledge, and store relevance.

Evidence
Feedback triage with priorities.
Mission value
120 CP
Owner
Jonas Weber
Participation
Voluntary review / CP contribution record, no automatic payment
Legal status
Platform review cleared for pilot framing
Apply to missionCP explained Open discussion
Secondary missions05
pilot-customer-b2cBeta feedbackOpen

Hobby gardener beta loop

Brings 10-20 testers with balcony, garden, or house plants into a structured loop.

Evidence
Participant list with consent and feedback window.
Mission value
180 CP
Owner
Mara Voit
Participation
Unpaid beta feedback / later recognition possible
Legal status
Platform review cleared for pilot framing
Join betaCP explained Open discussion
Secondary missions06
product-narrativeContent / editorialDraft

No-overclaim product narrative

Sharpens the value proposition without botanical, medical, or care guarantees.

Evidence
Positioning note plus store copy.
Mission value
120 CP
Owner
Nina Berger
Participation
Future recognition / CP contribution record, no automatic payment
Legal status
Not legally reviewed yet; not open for applications
Not open yetCP explained Open discussion
Secondary missions07
counsel-dsgvoCounsel reviewDraft

Consumer privacy review

Reviews image data, plant photos, account, and analytics options for the beta frame.

Evidence
Privacy checklist with release blockers.
Mission value
160 CP
Owner
Samira Keller
Participation
Counsel and compensation frame to be scoped separately; CP only records contribution
Legal status
Not legally reviewed yet; not open for applications
Not open yetCP explained Open discussion

People & contributions

Public roles and cleared contribution records for this project.

TMTim MergenthalerInitiatorNBNina BergerContributorMVMara VoitBeta user
Content / editorialNative store copy review

Store copy, onboarding tone, and beta-feedback questions were reviewed for no-overclaim and clarity.

Nina Berger120 CP Evidence
Beta feedbackHobby gardener beta loop

Beta loop for everyday testing with plant photos, Plant-Dex, and care tasks is reserved.

Mara Voitaccepted

Architecture / maturity

Beta community case: a functional consumer product that needs user, ASO, and pricing signals before launch.

Present

Store visual, TestFlight/Play Internal, core product, and clear B2C audience.

Still missing

ASO audit, native-speaker review, beta network, screenshot story, privacy review.

Architecture / maturity

Product, store visual, and beta channels are tangible; the gap is ASO, language, beta feedback, and audience reach.

Style note

The app may feel light and inviting, but plant identification and care advice must stay carefully worded.

InitiatorTim Mergenthaler

Initiator of Contributors Community and several beta projects; reviewer for governance, product, and AI boundaries.

Apply to mission Open audit room Open discussion Back to overview
DE
Sign inRegister